Merleau-Ponty on Beauvoirs Literary-Philosophical Method :: Philosophy Philosophical Papers

Merleau-Ponty on Beauvoirs Literary-Philosophical MethodABSTRACT Modern philosophy from the mid-nineteenth century on, has been particularly interested in choosing, adapting, and in some cases inventing literary forms to fit the particular philosophical subject under investigation. Simone de Beauvoir, with her explicit rejection of any formalist division between belles-lettres and philosophy, is one of the around interesting contributors to the modern development of philosophical writing. The amniotic fluid surrounding de Beauvoirs contribution to philosophical method are somewhat muddled because the literary forms she used innovatively for philosophy the novel and the short story defy (unlike, for example, the literary forms of Wittgenstein) resulted in writing which has been chiefly esteemed largely in terms of literature. In fact, many of her compositions rest simultaneously in both the categories of literature and philosophy. The significance of this aspect of her work wa s recognized by some of her contemporary philosophical associates, most particularly Merleau-Ponty. This paper draws on Merleau-Ponty to explore the philosophical ideas which stir de Beauvoirs methodology, and considers the nature and ramifications of her originality in terms of philosophys tradition of methodological novelty. 1. Philosophys Literary FormsIn this paper we want to examine a course of study error in which her fiction and philosophy are treated as mutually exclusive and separate categories. The underlying problem at work in contributing to this mistake is that of the conflation of a writerly form with the type of subject matter addressed by it. Falling into this confusion is particularly misleading for readers of Simone de Beauvoir because one of the most significant and fascinating aspects of her methodology lies in her explicit rejection of any formalist division between literature and philosophy. This is an intriguing aspect of her work which places it in an hono urable and innovative philosophical position. It is not often enough noted that one part of the Western philosophical tradition a part which is especially admirable is the diversity of writerly forms which have proved useful to its major practitioners. The dialogues of Plato and Hume, the fables of the Enlightenment philosophers, the dramatic narratives of Kierkegaard, the parables and aphorisms of Nietzsche, as well as the essays of Kant and Sartre are all part of that heritage. Equally, the mathematicians paper used by Tarski and Russell, and the scientific paper adapted and made so fashionable by the logical positivists, and that strange literary form devised by Wittgenstein, so eccentric that it obviously remains without a name and yet has its antecedent in Spinozas Ethics, all form part of the major lineage of ways in which philosophy has been successfully written.